Dr Ambedkar Law University 2010 Professional ethics, accountancy for lawyers and bar-bench relations - Question Paper
Register No.
/
(For Candidates admitted from 2009-2010 onwards) B.L. DEGREE EXAMINATION, MAY 2010. (Three Year Regular Course)
r
Second Semester - First Year
Practical -1 (External) - PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACCOUNTANCY FOR LAWYERS AND BAR-BENCH RELATIONS
Time : Two hours Maximum : 50 marks
PART A (2 x 10 = 20 marks)
Answer TWO of the following not exceeding Six pages each.
$dlQUlT0 GTT)S)0Lb
L51dsT<oii0(oy63TUfi)p<sn' 6iS)DL_uj6tfla;.
1. Define professional ethics in legal profession. Explain the duties of an advocate to the client.
Qitlq) $>(Lp6fi)iLi<sb otstus>
U63)IJlLlp. C$<SnriJ0@ $0 6Uipffir5l(0lflQJT I_&LD<9>CTT
ujbtfl eSloTSiisajLb.
What is contempt of courts? Analyse the categories of contempt of courts as categorised by the contempt of courts act 1971.
$<lm0jT{DrB]6tT c|<suld$)ul| CTOTprrd) srdfrsjr? 1971-<j,ib
LDdn-jDtiiaeiT suLOIuLj .
$><! LDdmpriiajdr GULDULj <su<s!T UjT)lfl U@UUITlJLl<SLj QsUJK.
Explain the charges of professional misconduct in legal profession and opinions of the disciplinary committee of the Bar council of India in Babulal Vs Subash-Jain.
ujTqcDrro) otit surrcity Qu9ei5T Grsrrlp euy>!<a) ffUL-Qn-jlaSleb QgsrrySld) Gs
UfT)f$lL|Lb jlj5$UJ 6liJjp.Sr5)(0IT6iT ID6OTIT)
((Lpefilsirr 0gj<srr up)$liLjii> eSlcrrffia.
PART B (6 x 5 = 30 marks)
Write short answers on SIX of the following not exceeding two pages each.
$<ajQ<suu0 GOT&lffi@Lb @gmr urEJSHenjS0 l61&itld&>
l5l05TSU0QJ?n'6lJ{i)p<otT @p$UJ 6$63>L- OT(Lp| :
(a) Functions of State Bar Councils.
LDrrjSI) <suffi#i$0iTffirr iDOTiDlar u<swf)aT.
(b) Contempt of courts of lawyers.
Upf5l(0ITffi(Stflr LDOT(DrBJ<5h-lJLDlLlLj.
(c) Supreme Court Bar Association Vs Union of Indian A.I.R. 1998. S.C. 1895.
]S<|) LDGSTJD CiJrj5)(0(TCiT llLD (STIT srdo.ll 1895.
(d) Disqualification for enrolment as an advocate. uy}i$0ijrr<$ u$6Lj Q-gpujiu @luSIiTa)LD.
(e) The contempt Jurisdiction of Subordinate courts. '
I
<Spa)LD LD5TfDfilffi!fl0JT cHCULDUq eiTQJDf]r.
(0 Prahalad Saran Gupta Vs Bar Council of India A.I.R. 1997. S.C. 1338.
LS)frffi0rrg5 8 CT6OT 0LJ(T OTllT @J5llLJ <SU IT
uDGrnpib .gg.iT. 1997. cr<sh).$. 1338.
(g) Constitution of Advocate Welfare Fund.
rtjD r!i (SiDLDuq.
(h) The importance of Accountancy for lawyers.
ULp{i51(0iT<S6(0a50 Rfr@u uefilujeSldn-
3
1503-10/TJ2
Attachment: |
Earning: Approval pending. |