National Law School of Indian University (NLSIU) 2006 B.A L.L.B ADMISSION TEST – ., LL.B(HONS.) PROGRAMME - Question Paper

(a) Mr. Rakesh's statement before the Judicial Magistrate amounts to confession.
(b) Mr. Rakesh's statement before the Judicial Magistrate does not amount to confession.
(c) The Judicial Magistrate can convict the four persons mentioned by Mr. Rakesh.
(d) Mr. Rakesh's statement should not be believed by the Judicial Magistrate, as he seems to be telling lies.

99. Principle: When 2 or more persons agree to do an illegal act, it is criminal conspiracy punishable with imprisonment.

Facts: Mr. Bharath is a learner of B.E. in Computer Science. He loves his computer very much. He considers his computer as his close friend and companion. On 1.4.2006, while interacting with his computer, he hacked into the Bank account of Mr. Javed and was successful in withdrawing money from Mr. Javed's bank account. He did it to please his girl friend.
(a) Mr. Bharath has committed an offence.
(b) Mr. Bharath has committed a cyber crime.
(c) Mr. Bharath has committed the offence of criminal conspiracy.
(d) Mr. Bharath has not committed the offence of criminal conspiracy.

100. Principle: Every agreement in restraint of the wedding of any person, other than a minor, is void.

Facts: Ms. Shakuntala is studying M.Sc. in Micro Biology. Mr. Shantanu is studying M.A. in Economics. Both of them were liking every other a lot. They agreed to get married. Accordingly they informed their parents. As they belonged to various communities, their parents did not agree for their proposed wedding. Instead enemity developed ranging from their parents. The parents insisted that Ms. Shakuntala and Mr. Shantanu must execute a written agreement that they will not marry every other. The circumstances were such that they executed an agreement accordingly. It was signed by both of them. The parents signed as witnesses. The agreement was drafted by a lawyer.
(a) Ms. Shakuntala and Mr. Shantanu cannot marry legally.
(b) Ms. Shakuntala and Mr. Shantanu can marry, but it will be illegal.
(c) Ms. Shakuntala and Mr. Shantanu can marry legally.
(d) The parents could have allowed Ms. Shakuntala and Mr. Shantanu to marry which would have promoted national integrity.

101. Principle: A time barred debt cannot be enforced in a Court of legal regulations. The time limit for enforcing a debt is three years from the date of demand made for repayment.

Facts: Mr. Banuchander had lent Rs. 10 lakhs to Ms. Nilanjana. Ms. Nilanjana had executed a Promissory Note, promising to repay the loan amount along with interest whenever it is demanded by Mr. Banuchander. The loan was provided on 1.1.2000. Mr. Banuchander demanded the lent amount of Rs. 10 lakhs along with the agreed amount of interest on 1.2.2003. In the meanwhile, Mr. Banuchander, a busy exporter, forgot about recovery of the amount provided to Ms. Nilanjana. Ms. Nilanjana also obtained it convenient and did not repay the amount. On 30th April, 2006, Mr. Banuchander remembers about the loan due from Ms. Nilanjana and accordingly demands the repayment of the loan. Ms. Nilanjana is not serious about the repayment now.

Earning:   Approval pending.