University of Delhi 2009 L.LB General Ll.biii lb - 302 limitation and arbirtation - Question Paper
1218 2 1. Attempt briefly any Four of the following :
t*') Limitation Act, 1963, only bars the remedy, but \does not destroy the right to which the remedy relates.
Effect of Fraud or mistake on limitation.
(c) Effect of acknowledgement on time-barred debt.
(<&What do you mean by the term International \ Commercial Arbitration as used under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(Waiver of right to object under the Arbitration 'and Conciliation Act, 1996.
xTR :
(T) 1963 rT TJWT >1 TO Tf t
fa) mm cfn i
(r) 'cti'iMifllci tr arfRtffW wm i
fa) 3rftim, 1996 snfcr
wdJmr>|q rfu|Ri)cb Tp$ % 3TrqiT 5JftR
'I/' nrThe proof of sufficient cause is a condition \ precedent for exercise of extraordinary discretion vested in the court. Merit is preferred to scuttle a decision on merits in turning down the case on technicalities of delay in presenting the appeal. Analyse the above statement in the light of Section
5 of the limitation Act.
The phrase time requisite as used in Section 12
of the Limitation Act means time properly
required. Explain.
PlfBfl SRTTtTTTJT 'H'MlJT
cRTT "STf "t- I 5TT[?T
R fqPlijMM qi<ri pi "'R "fTR 3vt*ii
3f&cT t I tJRf 5 eqH
>dMra tb'AT *11 I
() qRI-Hl tlRT 12 "WgxT 1W5T 'afWeftT.
w' 3T RrT VI % 3TtfsffT W t I I
3, (a) A cause of action for possession of immovable property had arisen to a minor when he was 16 year old. On attaining majority, he files the suit to get the possession of immovable property. How much time is left to recover the possession ? Discuss in the light of sections 6 and 8 of the Limitation Act. PTO
[This question paper contains 6 printed pages.]
1218 Your Roll No. * A ( A .7.
dfNW diHibH/'cb ___
LL.B
--J
III Term
Paper LB-302 - LIMITATION AND ARBITRATION
Time: 3 Hours Maximum Marks: 100
WFT : 3 Wnhft : 100
(Write your Roll No. on the top immediately on receipt of this question paper.)
W 3FFJT 3i$bm<h Qf&V t)
Note Answers may be written either in English or in Hindi; but the same medium should be used throughout the paper.
Attempt Five questions, including Question No. 1 which is compulsory and select at least one question each from Part I and Part II. All questions carry equal marks.
3TFT WHl'cb 1 WfirT Tc=T W JTFT / VFT I
wr II # 5TIFT 3mv /
& 3&T WfFT f I
P.T.O.
(b) Discuss the following :
(i) Any suit for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere.
(ii) Effect of Section 29 of the Limitation Act on any special or local law.
(<F) WT WJ PTfrT 53* 1eP?
1|3TT, W 16 7 2?T I Stl'-d
"3FRVIT % I % PfccWl t ?
-Mptr Hrcrafr 6 3(k8 szrw 3f /g<?
(j) *& Rff 3?k -vMmi rf sraftr
(ii) 3m fttt m Mfki 3rfSrf?m
fM 29 T I
4. The relief under writ petition to get arrears of salary, was refused to an employee of Municipal Council on the ground that it was a claim recoverable in a.civil action and the limitation had run out to file a civil suit. Can the time taken by the High Court in disposing of the matter from the date of the institution of the writ petition be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act ?
-qf T7
fc: iiitoi 3Fjfa 7 fsm w
% "S? STTT "MT =hKfi 'Sf R5CR#EF t 3 fRd T3 "5lfeR mRV-KT Tf t? I W A\*\<k cRt ftflcA '3
1r % arfrm <t tiro m 3*# dmfr fax ff '?rn # ?
PAUT u (wr n)
Iii ;ni arbitration agreement, the parties provided for
appointment of two arbitrations. When the arbitration
" proceeding started, one of the parties objected to
appointment of even number of arbitrations. Is his
objection sustainable in the light of provisions of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ? Discuss. <J\yy
w titcwt isw$ ffrr . i Tttmm w %
TtzrFERr' m #n frfr ter i ~m t3t 3TT&tT 3T ?prf 1996
URofa f ? fFT t
i
6. What is the nature of the function of the chief justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Discuss in the light of SBP & Co. V. Patel Engg. Ltd. (2Q05) 8SCC 618.
P.T.O.
1218 6
TTEETCSFT 3ifc 1996 URM1 W
3m -gRT 3Tfrf%rT TWT 7T t I
5& TPT sf$)fivl?lT (2005) 8
TT## 618 SEIR Tct flFT CifaV I
Ijf (W DescrTb'iT the amount of control conciliator \ exercises over conciliation proceeding. Does he cf1 Power to overrule the wishes of parties to \(r proceeding ? Discuss in light of provisions under
A* the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
f there be arbitration over winding-up
'lproceedings ?
) ttcie ~bi4ul TR dds >s!yebl<) chlf I TT \3Rj. TfFT cni4i6l cftoFT TSTiRt
Tilr t ? -smzrespr sifc <*15 dffyiH, 1996 3itr "3ti5fyt 3R>i?f %* i
(?&) <*Ml RFFT 'it" tfcfrrll I' ?
Write short notes on following :-
V Finality and enforcement of arbitral awards Competence of an arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction
'Pl*lfeif<cT. K- fcrlGfl :
(cfj) 3rfd7Tdf dlfc
SFR3T (2000)****
|
Attachment: |
| Earning: Approval pending. |
